An operator’s perspective for the boards and executive teams of the organizations that sponsor and administer charitable funds—community foundations, donor-advised fund sponsors, university foundations, and faith-based funds.

The field of charitable fund administration is entering a phase in which the technology a sponsor runs on will increasingly determine the strategic options available to its board. This is applicable most visibly to donor-advised funds (DAFs) considering how commoditized they have become, but also for community foundations, university and faith-based funds, and every organization that stewards charitable capital. Most organizations do not yet treat this as a board-level consideration. They will need to.

This brief argues that technology is no longer downstream of strategy—it is the foundation on which strategy is built. Organizations whose architecture cannot support a modern donor experience, advisor channels, compliance-by-design, and operational leverage will lose ground to peers that can, not in five years, but over the next two to three. The most consequential decision a board will make in this cycle is whether its technology foundation can carry the strategy the board wants to execute.


middle
Stephen Kump

Stephen Kump

Stephen is President, DAF Division at Foundation Source, a philanthropy technology company serving donors, institutions, and workplaces with turnkey philanthropic solutions. He is also the founder and a board director of Charityvest, a donor-advised fund sponsor, and Chairman of the Board of Teen Advisors, a nonprofit helping teenagers confront the young adult mental health crisis through peer-to-peer influence.